...engaging and very well researched ... Goldstein’s insightful and graceful prose reveals four authors during troubled moments of their careers, and he is fortunate in having a trove of writings from which to draw. Forster, Woolf and Eliot knew each other very well, read one another’s writings with an eye to what might be artistically useful, and reviewed one another’s work in journals. This year-in-the-life chronicle gives us a remarkable look at the gestation of literature.
In letting these four writers speak in their own words — their own witty, gossipy, often waspish words — Goldstein neatly avoids a dutiful chronicling of anything so weighty and abstruse as The Rise of Modernism. Cannily, he sacrifices historical sweep and gravitas for something much more grounded and intimate. In his hands, these literary lions prove surprisingly — and bracingly — catty ... The book comes alive in the ceaseless churn of these intersecting egos, as they turn their withering writerly gazes upon one another — and, less eagerly, upon themselves. Their professional and personal jealousy, spite, anxiety and outrage — the familiar hallmarks of the writer's personality — become a kind of humanizing background noise, drawing us in and allowing us to see them more fully ... enumerating how the year transformed their work proves the heavier lift, and Goldstein finds more success with some writers than others.
It is the linked portraits of Forster and Woolf, two friends who each, to their own ends, found a way forward in their work through the example of Proust, that form the most persuasive and valuable part of Mr. Goldstein’s book. The chapters on Eliot and Lawrence are somewhat less successful ... D.H. Lawrence is the odd man out in this quartet, and Mr. Goldstein’s claim that things changed radically for him in 1922 doesn’t convince ... What the book does show convincingly—and somewhat unexpectedly given Mr. Goldstein’s focus on the 'creative struggles' of these talented but fragile writers—is how important the help of friends and family was in supporting them.
Bill Goldstein’s The World Broke In Two is an indispensable guide to four legendary writers who were largely responsible for the creation of modern literature. What could have been a musty, fusty, dusty academic tome is, instead, an easily accessible encomium to a group of artists who did as much as any to shape 20th century fiction and poetry. Goldstein illuminates their personal crises, their professional failures, and finally their successes … Once Goldstein establishes the chief biographical elements of each of the four writers, he devotes the remainder of The World Broke in Two to detailing the shifts and accommodations each had to make to their lives and their work. He also clearly shows how Woolf, Eliot, Lawrence, and Forster benefited from the influence and inspiration of other major writers in their circle, most notably James Joyce, Marcel Proust, and Ezra Pound.
Although the unifying conceit of the book does not always hold, The World Broke in Two is a fascinating and informative look into the creative lives of this eminent quartet … The book is well researched, intelligent and entertaining. By delving into these writers’ letters and diaries to illuminate the development of their methods and ideas, Goldstein shines a welcome spotlight back onto an age when literary giants walked the earth.
Goldstein writes assuredly and well of the work of his chosen four exemplars; though Lawrence is barely read these days, the others still hold up, and he brings fresh eyes to all of them. An engaging, lightly worn literary study, of a piece with Hugh Kenner’s The Pound Era (1971) in divining the origins of the modern.
Goldstein’s plentiful digressions threaten to disjoint an already fragile narrative thread. Nonetheless, the intimate peek into the lives, rivalries, and heartbreaks of these celebrated writers sustains an entertaining story about how great literature is made, and will please scholars and hardcore fans alike.