A dozen pages into reading The Fruit Thief, I had the not unexciting realization that, if nothing else, for the next 300 pages I was in for an experience of unadulterated literature: that is, a work that would pay not the slightest heed to genre conventions, commercial imperatives or even — this I was less enthusiastic about — the reader’s timid expectation that he might be shown a good time. I was also reminded that I was dealing here with a very slippery fish ... The phantom limb pain of expecting that we will revert to the 'I' perspective fades into an acceptance that we’re stuck with Alexia for the remainder ... While there is no shortage of descriptive color and incident, albeit of a low-voltage variety, this long stretch — the bulk of the novel — is, frankly, hard going ... As an avant-garde firebrand in the 1960s, Handke wrote an 'anti-play' titled Offending the Audience, but now his strategy has shifted perilously close to Boring the Audience to Tears. Much like the narrator imagining the character of the fruit thief, I kept trying to envision a subset of readers who genuinely find this stuff delightful. Lacking most of the elements that draw people to fiction — insight, suspense and so on — it falls to either the language or the narrative material itself to make the novel worth the reader’s while. Although both have their moments — a mad speech in the final pages, an interlude at an inn that takes on the lighting and atmosphere of old European folk tales — the meal served up by this deeply eccentric novelist is spare and saltless, with no wine and no dessert. I suspect it’s the destiny of such an uncompromising writer as Peter Handke to end up writing basically for an audience of one. His most loyal readers, perhaps, adopt an attitude of veneration, hushed and solemn and more or less bored, the way many people attend Mass.

Every experience here becomes part of Handke’s gorgeous, multilayered tapestry ... Handke’s work was first published in 2017 in German, and this excellent English translation highlights the picaresque nature of the story. Alexia is an appealing vagabond as she moves from one episode to another, and Handke is a marvel at capturing and digging deeply into the history, sights, sounds, smells, and feel of France, which comes alive in his masterly hands.

This is almost a prehistory of experience, a demanding, engrossing narrative tracking tiny moment-to-moment changes of mood and impression, the sort of interior detail most writers would consider insignificant. Indeed, this intense focus on interior minutia creates a sense of tedium as Handke avoids providing so much of what we expect from novels. Then again, life has a way of giving us too little of the kind of excitement we crave ... Handke offers a reading experience that requires, and repays, a certain surrender.

... glacially slow but erudite ... the author is a savvy explorer of the minutiae of human experience, and makes every hour of his wanderer’s sojourn 'dramatic, even if nothing happened,' as the narrator notes. Handke’s descriptions of the landscape’s sights and sounds, such as how the peal of church bells bends into the roar of a confluence of rivers, offer much to savor. It adds up to a powerful anthem for 'the eternally daunted undaunted,' as the narrator calls those 'detour-takers' who might relate to the fruit thief, the 'bitterness-lovers,' and 'lost cause defenders.' Admirers of the stylistically cavalier Handke will be rewarded for taking in the scenery of this story.

... wandering, seemingly plotless ... Their travels don’t amount to much, but they afford Handke plenty of opportunities to sneer at modern mores and modern life and the boring homogeneity of humankind, especially the non-European sort ... A carping, tedious journey into the hinterlands.