Ackerman attempts to explicate the full-spectrum meltdown of the social and political culture, his vehicle of choice alternate history with a science-fiction twist ... Characters and plot points weave in and out of these dual controversies, but the complicated accusation against Abelson is hampered by the low stakes ... Yet the fact that the novel doesn’t snap, that it barely even bends, and remains idiosyncratic and engrossing throughout, is a testament to Ackerman’s expert juggling act ... Ackerman intelligently forces the reader to think about the mundane, arcane territory of inheritance-threatening lawsuits.
It’s funny what a tweak to history can — and can’t — do, an idea Ackerman explores thoughtfully, if at times a little dryly ... Ackerman also seems to argue that different presidents than those we’ve had wouldn’t eradicate bad foreign wars or stateside divisiveness ... An entertaining thought experiment, and Ackerman writes with a gentle, graceful style that befits Martin’s mild character ... Ackerman delivers a potent critique of the what-if nature of talking about history in general.
Speculative ... The prolific Ackerman uses an alternate world for a thoughtful and fascinating thought experiment, one that explores mortality, fate, and the malleability of historical memory.
Thought-provoking ... Though the monument debates feel well-worn, Ackerman is great at probing the scientific ethics of resurrection. This visionary tale is worth a look.