About Book Marks
Recent Reviews
Charles Baxter
Pan The Boston Globe The target of satire is never clearly defined. While there’s plenty to lampoon in today’s tech hubris, and ample opportunity to poke nervous fun at our own mystification around the unseen algorithms that shape our lives, Baxter introduces a third element whose satiric potential remains under-explored: the entire book, we come to understand, is a manuscript Brock has produced ... His ear for comedy in the ha ha sense falters here. The specifics are slightly off ... This book aims to be a tragicomic compendium of the way we live now, but its mishit notes make it hard to settle in and enjoy the music.
Becca Rothfeld
Rave The Washington Post Rothfeld makes an impassioned case for cacophony ... Rothfeld’s language is often extravagant, luxuriating in alliteration and internal rhyme ... This is Rothfeld at her very best, dancing across media, experience and scholarship to deliver a surprising conclusion ... Having just recovered from a dazzling insight, we might be provoked to argue with her (one can imagine she likes it that way), and we are never bored.
Janet Malcolm
Mixed The Washington Post There is little in this book about Malcolm’s adult life and career, which is the basis of our interest in her in the first place. She’s much more comfortable offering interesting trivialities about her early life than examining the decisions and contradictions that constituted her remarkable career ... We are left to treat Malcolm as the patient on the couch, free-associating at random, while we readers play analyst ... Malcolm’s beat was examining the stories people tell and figuring out what those stories might reveal about the tellers. For pitiless, clear-eyed Malcolmian insight on her life and influences, her career and its contradictions, we’ll have to wait for someone willing to consider what her refusal, or inability, to tell her own story reveals about her.
Sam Quinones
Rave The Boston Globe Quinones has done a marvelous job of cobbling together individual stories to give us a sense of how the systemic failures fall—hard—on individuals.
Mark O'Connell
Positive The Boston Globe ... chockful of this sort of rueful wit ... funny and sometimes enraging ... O’Connell, a witty and perceptive critic and contributor to The New York Times Magazine, is a good friend to have at the end of the world ... O’Connell is a wry and skeptical stand-in for the reader. There is a comfort in his prose. You get the sense this writer is taking time to order his experience, to bring coherence to his anxieties — and, by extension, to some of mine.
Lewis Hyde
Mixed Los Angeles Review of Books Hyde’s arguments are complicated, but one can think of them as stubborn refusals to take the established order for granted ... In A Primer for Forgetting, Hyde wants to trouble our notion of memory as always preferable to forgetfulness ... If we pitched Primer to TED Talk habitués, we could call it \'The Life-Changing Magic of Letting Things Go.\' But Hyde could never give a TED Talk. He refuses to sand the edges or round off the corners of his ideas. And when he extends his thought experiment from the individual to the communal, or national, uses of forgetting, he confronts the limits of his approach ...the question arises: Are we forgetting the right things? Are there things we’re required to remember? ... Forgetting, it would seem, privileges the powerful.